|
> Goals >Conferences >Selection Criterion >Application >FAQ |
Goals
The conferences will
promote an integrated community response to sexual violence by
selecting eight teams from communities as participants and awarding
them scholarships to attend a three-day conference in either the
United States or Canada. The teams will be selected from communities
where representatives from the police, prosecution and sexual
assault services demonstrate, through their application, that they
are prepared to work together to implement the social action program
designed by NAPASA and SATI. The winning team applicants
will:
receive training at a
national conference by Joanne Archambault and SATI for
developing an Integrated Community Sexual Assault Response and
by Edward Renner and NAPASA in the strategy and methods for
challenging the legal system to more effectively prosecute
sexual assaults. |
|
become international
partners in a US/Canada effort to set new national standards
for effectively prosecuting sex offenders, particularly ones
whose crimes do not fit the stereotype of rape. The activities
of the participant communities will be coordinated through a
dedicated web site. |
|
receive follow-up support through on-site and on-line consultations, evaluation, and through joint publications and presentations to academic, professional and applied journals and conferences. |
Long-term Conference
Outcomes
There is no "theory" to be tested in the usual research
sense, and the methodology is actually a strategy - the strategy
required to challenge the status quo. In the year following the
conference, we expect to see the following
improvements:
Increased numbers of
typical victims (non-stranger, lack of weapons and injury,
otherwise reputable offender) reporting their
assaults. |
|
Thorough and strategic
police investigations demonstrating knowledge about the
dynamics of sexual assault. |
|
Skilled collection of
evidence and victim support in typical cases where consent is
the probable defense. |
|
Strategic planning to
overcome obstacles by stakeholders. |
|
Advanced preparation for
anticipating "triggers" and presenting legal
arguments. |
|
Increased objections and
motions by the prosecution. |
|
Appeals in selected cases where objections are not sustained. |